Option (a) is correct.

Both Statement I and Statement II express Derrida's perspective on the nature of meaning in communication.

Statement I suggest that for Derrida, the meaning of a signifier (such as a word or symbol) will always be different at the point of consumption from the point of production. This is because the meaning of a signifier is not fixed or stable, but is instead constantly shifting and evolving. Derrida argued that language and communication are inherently unstable, and that there is always a gap between what is intended to be communicated and what is actually understood.

Statement II suggests that the original context of meaning cannot be reproduced. This is because Derrida believed that meaning is not inherent in the signifier itself, but is instead created through a complex web of associations and relationships. This means that the original context of meaning is always influenced by a range of factors, including the social, cultural, and historical context in which it was produced.

Jacques Derrida was a French philosopher, known for his work in the fields of deconstruction, literary theory, and continental philosophy. He is one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the 20th century, and his ideas have had a profound impact on fields as diverse as literary criticism, anthropology, political theory, and linguistics.

Derrida is perhaps best known for his concept of deconstruction, which he developed as a method of literary analysis. Deconstruction involves analyzing the underlying assumptions and hierarchies that are present in a text, in order to reveal the ways in which meaning is constructed and contested.

Derrida was also interested in questions of language and communication, and he argued that meaning is not fixed or stable, but is instead constantly shifting and evolving. He believed that language and communication are inherently unstable, and that there is always a gap between what is intended to be communicated and what is actually understood.

Derrida's work has been influential in a wide range of fields, and has provoked both enthusiastic support and vehement criticism. He died in 2004 at the age of 74.

विकल्प (a) सही है।

कथन I और कथन II दोनों सत्य हैं और संचार में अर्थ की प्रकृति पर देरिदा के परिप्रेक्ष्य को व्यक्त करते हैं।

कथन I देरिदा के अनुसार संकेतक अंतर्गत (जैसे कि एक शब्द या प्रतीक) उत्पादन के बिंदु से उपभोग के बिंदु पर अपने अर्थ में सदैव भिन्न होगा। ऐसा इसलिए है क्योंकि एक संकेतक का अर्थ निश्चित या स्थिर नहीं है, बल्कि इसके बजाय लगातार बदल रहा है और विकसित हो रहा है। देरिदा ने तर्क दिया कि भाषा और संचार स्वाभाविक रूप से अस्थिर हैं, और यह कि जो संचार करने का इरादा है और जो वास्तव में समझा जाता है, उसके बीच हमेशा एक अंतर होता है।

कथन II से पता चलता है कि अर्थ के मूल संदर्भ की पुनर्रचना नहीं की जा सकती है। ऐसा इसलिए है क्योंकि देरिदा का मानना था कि अर्थ स्वयं प्रतीक में अंतर्निहित नहीं हैं, बल्कि इसके बजाय संघों और रिश्तों के एक जटिल जाल के माध्यम से बनाया गया है। इसका आशय यह है कि अर्थ का मूल संदर्भ हमेशा कई कारकों से प्रभावित होता है, जिसमें सामाजिक, सांस्कृतिक और ऐतिहासिक संदर्भ शामिल हैं जिसमें इसका उत्पादन किया गया था।